Statement from Russian Antiwar Committee

On February 24, 2022, the Russian government, led by Vladimir Putin, launched an aggressive war against Ukraine. In the eyes of the world, this war crime has been committed by the whole country; by all Russians.

As a result, against our will we, citizens of the Russian Federation, have been held responsible for this violation of international law; a military invasion and massive loss of life. The enormity of the crime committed leaves no room for silence or passive dissent.

The Russian Anti-War Committee was created in order to oppose this bloody war — to develop a common position, to help people coordinate their efforts, and to resolve the enormous number of problems that have arisen because of Putin’s aggression.

We are convinced of the absolute value of human life, and that individual rights and freedoms are inviolable. Putin’s regime is a threat to these values. We see our task as uniting all forces to resist this.

It was not the Russians who started this war, but a mad dictator. But it is our civic duty to do everything we can to stop it.

Source: Russian Antiwar Committee https://antiwarcommittee.info/en/committee/

Note: The Russian Antiwar Committee has no connection with Antiwar.com, based in San Francisco, California. Antiwar.com has been a vocal supporter of Russian aggression and the Putin Regime since before Russian tanks and troops entered Ukraine.

Biden Opens the Floodgates on Weapons for the Middle East

by Matthew Petti @ Reason

A U.S. Air Force F-16 Fighting Falcon approaches a U.S. Air Force KC-135 Stratotanker to conduct an aerial refueling operation above the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, April 23, 2020. | U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Daniel Snider

A U.S. Air Force F-16 Fighting Falcon approaches a U.S. Air Force KC-135 Stratotanker to conduct an aerial refueling operation above the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, April 23, 2020. (U.S. Air Force photo by Staff Sgt. Daniel Snider)

It’s been a good week for the weapons industry. President Joe Biden signed off on order after order allowing American weapons to flow to Middle Eastern regimes. On Tuesday, The Wall Street Journal reported that the Biden administration will sell shipments of bombs worth $750 million to Saudi Arabia, breaking its ban on selling “offensive weapons” to the kingdom.

On the same day, the State Department announced over $20 billion in new arms sales to Israel, including fighter jets, armored vehicles, and ammunition. And the Friday before, the administration removed several major barriers to arming the Israeli military. It released $3.5 billion in U.S. taxpayer money for the Israeli military, unfroze a $262 million munition shipment that had been held up since May, and decided not to restrict U.S. aid to an Israeli army unit accused of beating an American to death.

Biden came into office promising to end “forever wars” in the Middle East. He pulled U.S. forces out of Afghanistan and oversaw a truce in the Yemeni civil war. Over the past year, however, Biden has reopened the war in Yemen and overseen the deadliest explosion of Israeli-Palestinian violence in history. His legacy may be ensuring that American weapons continue to fuel these conflicts after he leaves office.

For years, the United States supported the Saudi military in Yemen with aerial refuelingintelligence sharing, and a steady supply of ammunition—everything but dropping the bombs themselves. The war killed hundreds of thousands of Yemenis, spread famine and disease, and failed to dislodge the Houthi movement from power.

The Saudi government has not stopped pushing for U.S. military support. This week, they got their wish, with Biden approving a sale of 3,000 Small Diameter Bombs and 7,500 Paveway IV bombs over the next few months. Biden administration officials have said that shipments would not affect the Saudi-Houthi truce and hinted that they were meant to signal tighter U.S.-Saudi military cooperation in the future, The Wall Street Journal reported.

Biden has been a much more consistent supporter of the Israeli military campaign in Gaza following the October 7 attacks on Israel. Although he has verbally called for a ceasefire and held up a single shipment of bombs to the Israeli military, Biden has also worked to remove legal roadblocks and conceal the full amount of U.S. military support to Israel, including sending dozens of small shipments just below the threshold that would require congressional approval.

Earlier this year, Congress passed a $14 billion aid package for Israel. It included funds to replenish weapons that had been sent to Israel from U.S. military warehouses and direct financial grants to the Israeli government. On Friday, the Biden administration released $3.5 billion in those grants.

Most of the Israeli military spending bonanza announced over the past few days is not intended for use in Gaza. The largest portion of this expenditure is an $18.82 billion deal for F-15 fighter jets and related accessories, with deliveries scheduled for 2029.

The $262 million munition shipment, however, is immediately useful for the Israeli military. It includes 6,500 joint direct attack munition (JDAM) kits and a GPS guidance system for aerial bombs. Biden had held up the JDAM sale after the Israeli army invaded Rafah, displacing hundreds of thousands of Palestinians.

On Saturday, the Israeli military bombed a school and mosque with at least one American-made guided bomb, killing 93 people at dawn prayers. Israel claims that the attack killed 31 militants; the nonprofit Euro-Med Human Rights Monitor and Al Jazeera report that several of the “militants” on Israel’s list were either people who had died several days before or had no Hamas ties

In February 2021, Biden announced that he was “ending all American support for offensive operations in the war in Yemen, including relevant arm sales,” although he would continue to provide “defensive” support. In April 2022, the United Nations successfully brokered a ceasefire between the Saudi-led coalition and the Houthis that has held up so far.

But after a series of Houthi attacks on Israeli and foreign shipping in the Red Sea, the Biden administration launched the first direct U.S. strikes on Houthi forces—and the first airstrikes by anyone on Yemen in more than a year—in January this year.

Last month, Israeli forces dropped eight 2,000-pound bombs with JDAM kits on a tent city, killing Hamas commander Mohammad Deif along with 90 bystanders.

In addition to freeing up more money and munitions, the Biden administration moved to lift restrictions on how Israel can use this aid. A rule known as the Leahy Law forbids U.S. military aid from going to human rights abusers. In April 2024, the U.S. State Department announced a Leahy investigation into Israel’s Netzah Yehuda Battalion.

Netzah Yehuda had been accused of abusing Palestinian civilians in the West Bank, including Palestinian-American retiree Omar Assad, who died in their custody in January 2022. No soldiers were charged in connection with Assad’s death. In October 2021, Israeli police arrested four Netzah Yehuda troops for sexually assaulting a Palestinian detainee; one soldier pleaded guilty and was sentenced to four months in prison.

The Israeli government opposed any kind of “sanctions” on soldiers who are “fighting terrorist monsters.” So did Republicans in Congress. Sen. Marco Rubio (R–Fla.) called the investigation “an effort by President Biden to appease Israel’s enemies, including the antisemitic mobs terrorizing college campuses across America.”

On Friday, the State Department said that Israel had “effectively remediated” the problems with Netzah Yehuda by giving the troops a “two-week educational seminar.” The unit is now free to continue receiving weapons paid for by the American taxpayer.

Source: Matthew Petti @ Reason https://reason.com/2024/08/14/biden-opens-the-floodgates-on-weapons-for-the-middle-east/

Newsom denounces Trump’s authoritarian tendencies, but displays some himself

by Dan Walters, in the Orange County Register

While endorsing Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign for the presidency this month, Newsom declared, “With our democracy at stake and our future on the line, no one is better to prosecute the case against Donald Trump’s dark vision…”

Trump is “lighting democracy on fire,” Newsom told ABC News.

Fears that a second Trump presidency could be an authoritarian nightmare are well justified, given his many declarations of what he would do if elected. However, if one needs an example of how unchecked political power undermines democracy, Newsom’s California is available.

Newsom himself has displayed a penchant for governing by decree, especially evident during the COVID-19 pandemic. Meanwhile, with his Democratic Party holding total control of state government, its officeholders feel entitled to act as they please, ignoring those who might disagree.

The ruling party’s autocratic streak was demonstrated last month, when Newsom and the Legislature passed a state budget and dozens of “trailer bills” to implement its provisions. Both the budget and the trailer bills could be enacted with simple majority votes, thanks to a 2010 ballot measure, Proposition 25, that reduced the voting margin from two-thirds.

Prop. 25 was aimed at removing any Republican role in the budget, and it succeeded. However, it also created a way for governors and legislators to make changes in laws having little or nothing to do with the budget through trailer bills that could not be challenged by the referendum process.The video player is currently playing an ad. You can skip the ad in 5 sec with a mouse or keyboard

This year’s batch of trailer bills contain two pithy examples of the syndrome.

Assembly Bill 174 contains a slew of items mostly having to do with governmental operations, but one passage exempts the Legislature’s Capitol annex project from the California Environmental Quality Act. It aims to shut down efforts by two groups critical of the massive construction project to require changes.

The self-serving CEQA exemption not only was inserted into the bill in semi-secrecy, but it continues the rather shameful practice of granting such exemptions on a case-by-case basis rather than undertaking a comprehensive reform of the often misused law.

The second example, Senate Bill 167, is even more outrageous. It sets a very dangerous precedent of rewriting state tax laws retroactively.

The state Franchise Tax Board recently lost an appeal of a corporate tax caseinvolving Microsoft and a years-long dispute over the tax treatment of foreign earnings. The state Office of Tax Appeals ruled for Microsoft, thus requiring the state to refund $1.3 billion immediately, with hundreds of millions in other refunds in the future.

Rather than swallow its loss, the Franchise Tax Board persuaded Newsom’s Department of Finance to include language in SB 167 that voids the appellate ruling and potentially allows tax collectors to go back years and impose more taxes on corporations.

The implications are scary. Californians could fully pay their taxes and then years later be hit with new tax bills because the Legislature has changed tax law retroactively and perhaps even secretly.

The California Taxpayers Association is raising alarms about the law’s potential effects, and its president, Robert Gutierrez, says a legal challenge is being considered.

“This legislation shreds well-reasoned, unanimous decisions of California’s Office of Tax Appeals and serves as a not-so-hidden tax increase,” Gutierrez said. “This is a cash grab that undermines the tax system and threatens the integrity of the tax appeals process in California, and it must be stopped.”

What could be more authoritarian than arbitrary and retroactive increases in taxes?

Source: Dan Walter @ Orange County Register ocregister.com/2024/08/01/newsom-denounces-trumps-authoritarian-tendencies-but-displays-some-himself/

Advertisement

Liberal International calls for a full and accurate count of all the votes in the Venezuelan election

Liberal International strongly condemns the Venezuelan regime’s brazenly fraudulent election results, which falsely declare Nicolás Maduro as the winner, allegedly, with 51.20% of the vote. These results, announced by the regime-controlled National Electoral Council (CNE), starkly contradict the voting records from the tables by the unified democratic opposition. The opposition, led by the unjustly disqualified candidate Edmundo Gonzalez and Maria Corina Machado – leader of LI member party Vente Venezuela – reported a decisive victory with 70% of the vote.

LI further calls upon the National Electoral Council (CNE) to release the full results down to the polling division level and to conduct a hand count of all the printed vote slips. This hand count should be done and to do so in a transparent way, complete with independent and international observers.

LI stands firmly with the Venezuelan democratic opposition under the MUD, whose meticulous monitoring of all voting centers aligns with analyses from expert polling firms.

Dr. Hakima el Haite, President of Liberal International, emphasised, “We support the courageous efforts of Maria Corina Machado and Vente Venezuela. The people of Venezuela have spoken clearly in favor of democracy, peace, and against dictatorship. The regime must count all the votes fairly and transparently and respect the will of the people.”

Full Post @ Liberal International https://liberal-international.org/news-articles/fraudulent-election-venezuela/

“Trump and Vance’s Foreign Policy Is More War Disguised As Anti-War”

Matthew Petti @ Reason

Trump and Vance at the Republican National Convention | Carol Guzy/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom

From the headlines, you would think that Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump and his running mate J.D. Vance were committed to overthrowing the national security establishment.

“Trump Picking Vance Widens Rift With Foreign Policy Old Guard,” reported Bloomberg.

“Trump’s VP pick spells ‘disaster’ for Europe and Ukraine,” fumed Politico.

For all of Trump’s rhetoric about “endless wars” and Vance’s attacks on “neoconservatives,” however, the two politicians are all-in on some of the establishment’s most destructive military adventures. And in some ways, Trump and Vance are even more hawkish than the baseline.

“A lot of people recognize that we need to do something with Iran—but not these weak little bombing runs,” Vance said in a Fox News interview at the Republican National Convention on Monday. “If you’re going to punch the Iranians, you punch them hard, and that’s what [Trump] did when he took out [Iranian Gen. Qassem] Soleimani.”

Vance praised Trump for trying to “enable the Israelis and the Sunni Arab states” to fight back against Iran. In a speech to the Quincy Institute in May, Vance tried to sell a U.S.-Israeli-Arab alliance as a way for the United States to “spend less time and less resources in the Middle East.”

But that’s exactly the strategy that got us here in the first place, and the proof is in the pudding. Trump’s shows of force against Iran did not decisively end U.S.-Iranian conflict, nor did the Abraham Accords get Israel and the Arab states to pick up the military slack.

Instead, Trump ended up overseeing a massive U.S. military buildup in the region during his term and nearly went to war with Iran.

Vance even wants to add another counterinsurgency to America’s “forever war” roster. In July 2023, he told NBC News that he would “empower the president of the United States, whether that’s a Democrat or Republican, to use the power of the U.S. military to go after these drug cartels” in Latin America.

Washington is already heavily involved in that region’s war on drugs, doling out support to Latin American militaries and border forces. Last year, several Republican candidates—including Trump himself—called for the United States to invade Mexico directly.

Trump and Vance also share the establishment view that the United States needs to get ready for a conflict with China over Taiwan. At the convention, Vance told Fox News that China is the “biggest threat” to America, and he has voiced support for building up the Taiwanese military with American weapons in the past.

Full Post by Matthew Petti @ Reason https://reason.com/2024/07/16/trump-and-vances-foreign-policy-is-more-war-disguised-as-anti-war/

Noir Alley:Eddie Muller and the “Red Scare”

by Gene Berkman

Noir Alley is a weekly film series on Turner Classic Movies. Normally starting at 9:00 PM on Saturday night, Noir Alley features films about crime and its detection, most from the late 1940s and early 1950s.

“Noir” is a French word, meaning “black” or “dark” and it has a double meaning (at least) as a descriptive for these films. Much of the action in Noir films takes place at night, in dimly light alleys, hallways or even harbors. “Noir” also refers to the darkness in the hearts and minds of the protagonists in these movies, and not always just the darkness of the villain’s deeds.

I have watched Noir Alley every week for several years. The quality of the films varies. Some are classics of the genre. A few are classics beyond any genre. And many are mid-grade “B” films, but even these are interesting for what they tell us about the era in which they were made and in which the plots take place.

Adding to the value of Noir Alley for the film enthusiast, or the cultural historian, Eddie Muller offers an intro setting some of the context for the film – how it was made, some facts about the writer(s), director, and main actors, and other interesting tidbits. More interesting usually is the outro, which gives more information on the film, the stars and what happened to them, and even the writers and directors.

Given the period in which most of the films shown were made – 1946 to 1954, as Eddie Muller noted in his intro Saturday night, July 13 – it is inevitable that politics intrudes into the stories of the films, and of the people who made them. Mr Muller gave an extended, and interesting talk on the significance of the “Red Scare” and the blacklist on Noir film making in the postwar period. To make clear the importance of context, Mr Muller states “…you cannot understand the Normandy invasion without knowing about the Holocaust…”

It does not diminish the horror of the Holocaust to note that the soldiers, sailors and military commanders involved in the Normandy invasion were not likely to be aware of the genocide being undertaken by the National Socialist regime in Germany. They were fighting the Third Reich to save Britain and France. But the Holocaust is important. It is part of the context for World War II. Just so, there is a context to the Red Scare in America that Eddie Muller has not really mentioned.

The Normandy Invasion was not specifically a response to the Holocaust, Eddie. But the Holocaust is directly related to another invasion – the Invasion of Poland in 1939, the proximate cause of the second European war, during which the Holocaust became the horrific historical fact that we still remember today. We often don’t remember that when troops of the German Reich invaded Poland from the west, the Soviet Red Army entered Poland from the rear – I mean, the east.

The Invasion of Poland was the cause invoked by Britain and France to go to war with Germany. Poland was home to 3 million Jews, the largest Jewish population in Europe. The German death camps were established in Poland, and Polish Jews constituted the largest single bloc of victims of the Holocaust. The invasion of Poland took place during a period in which the Soviet Union was in alliance with National Socialist Germany.

Dark as these facts are, what do they have to do with Noir Alley, and Noir film of the postwar period? Victims. There are more victims than Eddie Muller has talked about – millions more. And those victims are part of the context for the Red scare, the expose of writers and actors with sympathies for the Soviet Union, and the Blacklist that Eddie Muller brings to light on a regular basis. But Eddie Muller is not the only one silent about the victims. How about the victims Eddie Muller talks about – did they say anything about Stalin’s alliance with Hitler that brought the subjugation of Poland, and the second European War?

Writers, directors and actors that were real or potential victims of the Hollywood blacklist, or of harassment by official agencies or crusading politicians were people who were or had been members of The Communist Party, or supporters of campaigns and front groups created by the Communist Party. They can include people involved in the Party or in front groups before the invasion of Poland, who remained loyal to the Party into the postwar years; those who joined the Communist Party or supported front groups after German invaded the Soviet Union; they saw the USSR as a bulwark against Nazi Germany despite the material support given the German Reich during the period of the Hitler-Stalin Pact.

The third group was composed of Dalton Trumbo. He was very anti-war, not a bad thing. He wrote Johnny Got His Gun during the period of the Hitler Stalin Pact. But he was not a member of the Party when he wrote the book. At the time the Communist Party was campaigning against any American involvement in a war to save Britain and France. That was the party line during the Hitler Stalin Pact, and Trumbo saw the party as a force for peace. Trumbo joined the Communist Party when it was allied with Nazi Germany. As Forest Gump would say, “…that weren’t a smart thing to do.”

I appreciate Eddie Muller’s little histories of the people who made these films. Some went into exile to continue working in films during the blacklist period. Some submitted scripts under pseudonyms. As Dalton Trumbo noted – “…the blacklist exists. So does the black market.” None of his little histories have involved writers or actors assassinated by FBI or CIA death squads, but the past is the undiscovered country.

Some of those who where blacklisted produced good or even great cinema, available because of the black market, offshore production and foreign employment. We don’t know as much about dissident writers or actors in the Soviet Union in the Noir Alley period, because the American writers and actors did not take up their cause. We often don’t know their names – there are many unmarked graves in Soviet labor camps.

I was hoping for some balance when he announced a film that would be obviously anti-Communist. Naturally, he showed a film that was over the top, and used the history of the development of the film to highlight the oppressive atmosphere for writers at the Hughes studio during the Cold War. Probably all true, and interesting. With the vast film library available to him, including foreign films. Eddie Muller could do a service if he found a sophisticated noir film that dealt with totalitarianism and those who commit to it and act on its behalf.

I can mention modern films that highlight the reasons people oppose Communism, and even Communists. Too modern for Noir Alley, but each has Noir elements. The Lives of Others includes undercover police, smuggling, blackmail, and police corruption in East Germany.

The Death of Stalin has a dead body, political corruption, undercover police, and complicated motives in the very era Noir Alley focuses on. The Death of Stalin takes place in1953, but has regular reference to events up to 15 years earlier that led to the death and its aftermath.

Mr. Jones takes place in the 1930’s as some Noir Alley movies have done. Much of the action takes place at night in ill lit circumstances. There are dead bodies, some shown, more alluded to. An undercover investigator tries to expose a big crime. Most of the eye-witnesses are dead. Official agencies, news companies and writers he attempts to convince all have vested interests in their friendship with the perpetrator of the crime.

Of course, if Eddie Muller were to run Mr. Jones on Noir Alley, he would hopefully mention that today we know the crime boss in charge of the mass murder in Ukraine in the late 1930s. The crime boss was Joseph Stalin – still head of the Soviet regime in 1946 to 1953, when many Noir Alley writers and actors were still sympathetic to the great leader of the Russian people.

We can be sure that Mr. Jones portrays crimes that are way too dark for Noir Alley. It would have been nice if Dalton Trumbo or Lillian Hellman had ever acknowledged these crimes.

Turner Classic Movies is a private enterprise in America. I watch TCM alot, and I always watch Noir Alley. I would not presume to tell someone else how to run their business, unless they asked. But having watched it for years, I will always think of Saturday night as the night for Eddie Muller’s Rouge Alley.

Luttig: Trump, other presidents now ‘above the law’

Sarah Fortinsky writes @ The Hill:

J. Michael Luttig, informal advisor to former Vice President Pence, during a Jan. 6 House Select Committee hearing on Thursday, June 16, 2022 focusing on the involvement of former Vice President Pence and his staff on Jan. 6.

Retired federal judge J. Michael Luttig said former President Trump and other U.S. presidents can now be considered “above the law” after the Supreme Court ruled Monday that core presidential powers are immune from prosecution.

“It can never again be said that in America ‘no man is above the law,’” Luttig, a longtime conservative jurist on the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, said in a post on the social platform X.

“The Supreme Court held today that the President of the United States — and the former president in particular — is above the law, and the only person in America who is above the law,” Luttig added.

The Monday ruling, which was decided along ideological lines, marked a significant victory for Trump. It found that presidents have absolute immunity for actions taken within their core official responsibilities, and they have presumptive immunity for all other official acts.

The 6-3 decision all but guarantees that the 2020 election interference case against Trump will not head to trial before the November election. The ruling sends the case back to the district court to determine if specific actions taken by Trump leading up to the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot fall outside the immunity protections.

Luttig has in recent years been among the most high-profile conservative critics of Trump and his efforts to stay in power after losing the 2020 election; the former judge testified during the Jan. 6 House select committee’s hearings.

He has also criticized the high court for past decisions involving Trump, including in determining that the 14th Amendment’s insurrection ban did not disqualify Trump from the ballot.

The Supreme Court’s latest ruling comes four months before Election Day, when Trump hopes to retake the White House. The former president has floated removing the special counsel who brought two indictments against him if he were elected.

Source: The Hill https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4750245-luttig-trump-other-presidents-now-above-the-law/

Ukraine:Forced Russified Education under Occupation

Human Rights Watch has issued a 66 page report “Education under Occupation: Forced Russification in Occupied Ukrainian Territories” which documents violations of international by Russian authorities in formerly occupied territories of Ukraine’s Kharkivska region, and other regions which remain under Russian control.

Human Rights Watch interviewed 42 educators, school staff. and other officials in Kharkivska region after Russian forces left the area, and interviewed teachers who had been displaced or escaped from the areas of Khersonska, Zaporiska, Donetska, and Luhanska regions that are currently under occupation.

The full report from Human Rights Watch is available @ https://www.hrw.org/report/2024/06/20/education-under-occupation/forced-russification-school-system-occupied-ukrainian

Biden Wants a Defense Pact With Saudi Arabia While 9/11 Victims Are Suing the Kingdom

The White House announced a “near final” defense pact with Saudi Arabia yesterday, just as new evidence about Saudi links to 9/11 is emerging.

MATTHEW PETTI | 5.21.2024 10:59 AM

Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman Al Saud (known as MBS) receives US President Joe Biden at the Royal Palace in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, on July 15, 2022. | Abaca Press/Balkis Press/Abaca/Sipa USA/Newscom

American troops might be pledged to defend Saudi territory soon. President Joe Biden is seeking a “mega-deal” that would bind the United States, Saudi Arabia, and Israel into a Middle Eastern military alliance. After Biden’s National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan met with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman last week, both governments announced that they had a “near-final” version of a defense pact worked out.

A group of 9/11 victims’ families wants something very different. For years, they have been suing the Saudi government, based on alleged contacts between Saudi officials and 9/11 hijackers. Earlier this month, the Saudi government argued that its officials had nothing to do with the attacks and motioned for the case to be thrown out. The families’ lawyers responded with a bombshell filing: They claim to have new evidence that the 9/11 hijackers were assisted by “a covert and illegal Saudi government platform” on American soil.

The families’ filing focuses on accused Saudi spy Omar Al Bayoumi, who hosted two of the future hijackers in southern California, and Saudi diplomat Fahad Al Thumairy, who allegedly sent an associate to help host them. The Saudi government argues that Bayoumi “had innocent motives: to help fellow Saudis who were new to the San Diego Muslim community and to get a referral fee from his apartment manager. Al Thumairy did not assist the hijackers at all.”

But the families cited several new pieces of evidence that have not been revealed to the public yet—including FBI memos, home videos of Al Bayoumi, and phone surveillance records—that link Al Bayoumi and Al Thumairy to the hijackers. The families also have a “smoking gun” from British police, a notebook seized from Al Bayoumi that includes “a drawing of a plane, alongside a calculation used to discern the distance at which a target on the ground will be visible from a certain altitude.”

Full Post by Matthew Petti @ Reason https://reason.com/2024/05/21/biden-wants-a-defense-pact-with-saudi-arabia-while-9-11-victims-are-suing-the-kingdom/