Liberal International calls for a full and accurate count of all the votes in the Venezuelan election

Liberal International strongly condemns the Venezuelan regime’s brazenly fraudulent election results, which falsely declare Nicolás Maduro as the winner, allegedly, with 51.20% of the vote. These results, announced by the regime-controlled National Electoral Council (CNE), starkly contradict the voting records from the tables by the unified democratic opposition. The opposition, led by the unjustly disqualified candidate Edmundo Gonzalez and Maria Corina Machado – leader of LI member party Vente Venezuela – reported a decisive victory with 70% of the vote.

LI further calls upon the National Electoral Council (CNE) to release the full results down to the polling division level and to conduct a hand count of all the printed vote slips. This hand count should be done and to do so in a transparent way, complete with independent and international observers.

LI stands firmly with the Venezuelan democratic opposition under the MUD, whose meticulous monitoring of all voting centers aligns with analyses from expert polling firms.

Dr. Hakima el Haite, President of Liberal International, emphasised, “We support the courageous efforts of Maria Corina Machado and Vente Venezuela. The people of Venezuela have spoken clearly in favor of democracy, peace, and against dictatorship. The regime must count all the votes fairly and transparently and respect the will of the people.”

Full Post @ Liberal International https://liberal-international.org/news-articles/fraudulent-election-venezuela/

“Trump and Vance’s Foreign Policy Is More War Disguised As Anti-War”

Matthew Petti @ Reason

Trump and Vance at the Republican National Convention | Carol Guzy/ZUMAPRESS/Newscom

From the headlines, you would think that Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump and his running mate J.D. Vance were committed to overthrowing the national security establishment.

“Trump Picking Vance Widens Rift With Foreign Policy Old Guard,” reported Bloomberg.

“Trump’s VP pick spells ‘disaster’ for Europe and Ukraine,” fumed Politico.

For all of Trump’s rhetoric about “endless wars” and Vance’s attacks on “neoconservatives,” however, the two politicians are all-in on some of the establishment’s most destructive military adventures. And in some ways, Trump and Vance are even more hawkish than the baseline.

“A lot of people recognize that we need to do something with Iran—but not these weak little bombing runs,” Vance said in a Fox News interview at the Republican National Convention on Monday. “If you’re going to punch the Iranians, you punch them hard, and that’s what [Trump] did when he took out [Iranian Gen. Qassem] Soleimani.”

Vance praised Trump for trying to “enable the Israelis and the Sunni Arab states” to fight back against Iran. In a speech to the Quincy Institute in May, Vance tried to sell a U.S.-Israeli-Arab alliance as a way for the United States to “spend less time and less resources in the Middle East.”

But that’s exactly the strategy that got us here in the first place, and the proof is in the pudding. Trump’s shows of force against Iran did not decisively end U.S.-Iranian conflict, nor did the Abraham Accords get Israel and the Arab states to pick up the military slack.

Instead, Trump ended up overseeing a massive U.S. military buildup in the region during his term and nearly went to war with Iran.

Vance even wants to add another counterinsurgency to America’s “forever war” roster. In July 2023, he told NBC News that he would “empower the president of the United States, whether that’s a Democrat or Republican, to use the power of the U.S. military to go after these drug cartels” in Latin America.

Washington is already heavily involved in that region’s war on drugs, doling out support to Latin American militaries and border forces. Last year, several Republican candidates—including Trump himself—called for the United States to invade Mexico directly.

Trump and Vance also share the establishment view that the United States needs to get ready for a conflict with China over Taiwan. At the convention, Vance told Fox News that China is the “biggest threat” to America, and he has voiced support for building up the Taiwanese military with American weapons in the past.

Full Post by Matthew Petti @ Reason https://reason.com/2024/07/16/trump-and-vances-foreign-policy-is-more-war-disguised-as-anti-war/

Noir Alley:Eddie Muller and the “Red Scare”

by Gene Berkman

Noir Alley is a weekly film series on Turner Classic Movies. Normally starting at 9:00 PM on Saturday night, Noir Alley features films about crime and its detection, most from the late 1940s and early 1950s.

“Noir” is a French word, meaning “black” or “dark” and it has a double meaning (at least) as a descriptive for these films. Much of the action in Noir films takes place at night, in dimly light alleys, hallways or even harbors. “Noir” also refers to the darkness in the hearts and minds of the protagonists in these movies, and not always just the darkness of the villain’s deeds.

I have watched Noir Alley every week for several years. The quality of the films varies. Some are classics of the genre. A few are classics beyond any genre. And many are mid-grade “B” films, but even these are interesting for what they tell us about the era in which they were made and in which the plots take place.

Adding to the value of Noir Alley for the film enthusiast, or the cultural historian, Eddie Muller offers an intro setting some of the context for the film – how it was made, some facts about the writer(s), director, and main actors, and other interesting tidbits. More interesting usually is the outro, which gives more information on the film, the stars and what happened to them, and even the writers and directors.

Given the period in which most of the films shown were made – 1946 to 1954, as Eddie Muller noted in his intro Saturday night, July 13 – it is inevitable that politics intrudes into the stories of the films, and of the people who made them. Mr Muller gave an extended, and interesting talk on the significance of the “Red Scare” and the blacklist on Noir film making in the postwar period. To make clear the importance of context, Mr Muller states “…you cannot understand the Normandy invasion without knowing about the Holocaust…”

It does not diminish the horror of the Holocaust to note that the soldiers, sailors and military commanders involved in the Normandy invasion were not likely to be aware of the genocide being undertaken by the National Socialist regime in Germany. They were fighting the Third Reich to save Britain and France. But the Holocaust is important. It is part of the context for World War II. Just so, there is a context to the Red Scare in America that Eddie Muller has not really mentioned.

The Normandy Invasion was not specifically a response to the Holocaust, Eddie. But the Holocaust is directly related to another invasion – the Invasion of Poland in 1939, the proximate cause of the second European war, during which the Holocaust became the horrific historical fact that we still remember today. We often don’t remember that when troops of the German Reich invaded Poland from the west, the Soviet Red Army entered Poland from the rear – I mean, the east.

The Invasion of Poland was the cause invoked by Britain and France to go to war with Germany. Poland was home to 3 million Jews, the largest Jewish population in Europe. The German death camps were established in Poland, and Polish Jews constituted the largest single bloc of victims of the Holocaust. The invasion of Poland took place during a period in which the Soviet Union was in alliance with National Socialist Germany.

Dark as these facts are, what do they have to do with Noir Alley, and Noir film of the postwar period? Victims. There are more victims than Eddie Muller has talked about – millions more. And those victims are part of the context for the Red scare, the expose of writers and actors with sympathies for the Soviet Union, and the Blacklist that Eddie Muller brings to light on a regular basis. But Eddie Muller is not the only one silent about the victims. How about the victims Eddie Muller talks about – did they say anything about Stalin’s alliance with Hitler that brought the subjugation of Poland, and the second European War?

Writers, directors and actors that were real or potential victims of the Hollywood blacklist, or of harassment by official agencies or crusading politicians were people who were or had been members of The Communist Party, or supporters of campaigns and front groups created by the Communist Party. They can include people involved in the Party or in front groups before the invasion of Poland, who remained loyal to the Party into the postwar years; those who joined the Communist Party or supported front groups after German invaded the Soviet Union; they saw the USSR as a bulwark against Nazi Germany despite the material support given the German Reich during the period of the Hitler-Stalin Pact.

The third group was composed of Dalton Trumbo. He was very anti-war, not a bad thing. He wrote Johnny Got His Gun during the period of the Hitler Stalin Pact. But he was not a member of the Party when he wrote the book. At the time the Communist Party was campaigning against any American involvement in a war to save Britain and France. That was the party line during the Hitler Stalin Pact, and Trumbo saw the party as a force for peace. Trumbo joined the Communist Party when it was allied with Nazi Germany. As Forest Gump would say, “…that weren’t a smart thing to do.”

I appreciate Eddie Muller’s little histories of the people who made these films. Some went into exile to continue working in films during the blacklist period. Some submitted scripts under pseudonyms. As Dalton Trumbo noted – “…the blacklist exists. So does the black market.” None of his little histories have involved writers or actors assassinated by FBI or CIA death squads, but the past is the undiscovered country.

Some of those who where blacklisted produced good or even great cinema, available because of the black market, offshore production and foreign employment. We don’t know as much about dissident writers or actors in the Soviet Union in the Noir Alley period, because the American writers and actors did not take up their cause. We often don’t know their names – there are many unmarked graves in Soviet labor camps.

I was hoping for some balance when he announced a film that would be obviously anti-Communist. Naturally, he showed a film that was over the top, and used the history of the development of the film to highlight the oppressive atmosphere for writers at the Hughes studio during the Cold War. Probably all true, and interesting. With the vast film library available to him, including foreign films. Eddie Muller could do a service if he found a sophisticated noir film that dealt with totalitarianism and those who commit to it and act on its behalf.

I can mention modern films that highlight the reasons people oppose Communism, and even Communists. Too modern for Noir Alley, but each has Noir elements. The Lives of Others includes undercover police, smuggling, blackmail, and police corruption in East Germany.

The Death of Stalin has a dead body, political corruption, undercover police, and complicated motives in the very era Noir Alley focuses on. The Death of Stalin takes place in1953, but has regular reference to events up to 15 years earlier that led to the death and its aftermath.

Mr. Jones takes place in the 1930’s as some Noir Alley movies have done. Much of the action takes place at night in ill lit circumstances. There are dead bodies, some shown, more alluded to. An undercover investigator tries to expose a big crime. Most of the eye-witnesses are dead. Official agencies, news companies and writers he attempts to convince all have vested interests in their friendship with the perpetrator of the crime.

Of course, if Eddie Muller were to run Mr. Jones on Noir Alley, he would hopefully mention that today we know the crime boss in charge of the mass murder in Ukraine in the late 1930s. The crime boss was Joseph Stalin – still head of the Soviet regime in 1946 to 1953, when many Noir Alley writers and actors were still sympathetic to the great leader of the Russian people.

We can be sure that Mr. Jones portrays crimes that are way too dark for Noir Alley. It would have been nice if Dalton Trumbo or Lillian Hellman had ever acknowledged these crimes.

Turner Classic Movies is a private enterprise in America. I watch TCM alot, and I always watch Noir Alley. I would not presume to tell someone else how to run their business, unless they asked. But having watched it for years, I will always think of Saturday night as the night for Eddie Muller’s Rouge Alley.

Luttig: Trump, other presidents now ‘above the law’

Sarah Fortinsky writes @ The Hill:

J. Michael Luttig, informal advisor to former Vice President Pence, during a Jan. 6 House Select Committee hearing on Thursday, June 16, 2022 focusing on the involvement of former Vice President Pence and his staff on Jan. 6.

Retired federal judge J. Michael Luttig said former President Trump and other U.S. presidents can now be considered “above the law” after the Supreme Court ruled Monday that core presidential powers are immune from prosecution.

“It can never again be said that in America ‘no man is above the law,’” Luttig, a longtime conservative jurist on the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, said in a post on the social platform X.

“The Supreme Court held today that the President of the United States — and the former president in particular — is above the law, and the only person in America who is above the law,” Luttig added.

The Monday ruling, which was decided along ideological lines, marked a significant victory for Trump. It found that presidents have absolute immunity for actions taken within their core official responsibilities, and they have presumptive immunity for all other official acts.

The 6-3 decision all but guarantees that the 2020 election interference case against Trump will not head to trial before the November election. The ruling sends the case back to the district court to determine if specific actions taken by Trump leading up to the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot fall outside the immunity protections.

Luttig has in recent years been among the most high-profile conservative critics of Trump and his efforts to stay in power after losing the 2020 election; the former judge testified during the Jan. 6 House select committee’s hearings.

He has also criticized the high court for past decisions involving Trump, including in determining that the 14th Amendment’s insurrection ban did not disqualify Trump from the ballot.

The Supreme Court’s latest ruling comes four months before Election Day, when Trump hopes to retake the White House. The former president has floated removing the special counsel who brought two indictments against him if he were elected.

Source: The Hill https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4750245-luttig-trump-other-presidents-now-above-the-law/